Corruption scandals earn Fitch negative bank report

 
1,601Views 3Comments Posted 16/03/2017

ODEBRECHT and ongoing corruption scandals have produced a negative outlook for Panamanian banks from Fitch Ratings.

Fitch issued a report on Wednesday, March 15 warning that a reputational risk remains as a key concern for Panama’s banks, and also expects to accelerate the deterioration of the quality of assets.

The reputational risk that it observes in  Panamanian banks are linked to the corruption scandals of Brazilian firms Odebrecht and Petrobras in 2017, which have focused attention on corporate corruption in Latin America.

In the case of Odebrecht's corruption, Switzerland's federal prosecutors formally charged the two sons of former president Ricardo Martinelli Berrocal - Luis Enrique and Ricardo Alberto Martinelli Linares of bribery of foreign officials and of money laundering, and  seized $22 million in bank accounts.

According to evidence obtained from bank transactions, prosecutors suspect that the money was paid on orders from Odebrecht in  bribes for infrastructure works awarded to the company by the State

In the case of the oil company Petrobras, Fitch reports that a Panama bank has been involved: "After the accusations in 2016 by the Brazilian authorities, that

It received funds from the corruption of contractors and directors of Petrobras, FPB Bank was under the administrative control of the Panamanian regulator”

Brazilian prosecutors have detected alleged

assets in which a company incorporated in Panama, Constructora Internacional del Sur was a  recipient of more than $47 million, into an account at Credicorp Bank.

The financial architecture designed to avoid the tracking of money had as its primary source funds from Petrobras, to then go through companies controlled by Odebrecht.

The rating agency indicated that banks directly involved in recent corruption and money laundering have resulted in small franchises, without significant participation in local market deposits.

"This has allowed a relatively efficient damage control by the regulator. A potential risk event in a medium or large bank would possibly have systemic implications”  although Fitch believes that this is less likely to

happen, as large banks often have corporate governance controls